History of a Genocide (III)

A light in the tunnel: The first reports

We continue our journey with installment number 3. In the previous one, (History of a Genocide-II), we focused on the absurd and anti-medical measures that all countries adopted in unison. The decisions that were made were political decisions, not medical ones.

As I said in the previous installment, in January 2020 the idea of a global vaccination began to prevail. At that precise moment I sensed that with such a premeditated measure they wanted to inoculate everyone with something that they would introduce into the vaccine. And I was not wrong, time proved me right. I warned on social networks, but no one paid attention to me.

The proposal establishing the zoonotic nature of the virus was also not satisfactory to me from a logical point of view. Over the millennia we have shared our environment with various animal species, even in previous centuries in a much closer coexistence than today, since animals resided in the same homes as us. However, there were never flu epidemics or other similar phenomena. And curiously, in the 21st century, we witness how a virus that supposedly originated in bats or pangolins, manages to jump to the human species in an almost magical way.

I, like many, was convinced about the possible leak of SARS-CoV-2 from the virology laboratory located in Wuhan. This conviction was still due to the wide dissemination of this official version by the media in various nations, who presented news like this¹ :

The Washington Times - Sunday, January 26, 2020

This theory of a virus escape was also supported by studies like this one², which precisely emerged that same month of January:

In it, certain Indian doctors, once analyzed and supposedly sequenced the virus, saw an alleged introduction of DNA sequences of the AIDS virus.

Knowing the truth now, and looking at the past, I verify that the purpose of this move remained the same, to create more fear for the previously mentioned purpose, vaccination.

We must remember the previous statement about ACE2, which was presented as the entry mechanism of the coronavirus into human cells. It was suggested that this disease mainly affected older people, excluding young people and children who did not have this receptor and was therefore not a cause for concern.

In reality, it was observed that the spread of this disease was predominantly concentrated in nursing homes, as deaths were constantly reported in these institutions. Once the vaccine was ready for implementation and the vaccination campaign began, the importance of immunizing children was emphasized, considering them as highly contagious potential transmitters. But didn't we conclude that the children did not have the AC2 receptor and therefore were not infected nor did they infect others? So, what's the final decision?? Why do they have to be vaccinated? Oh, I get it, what it was about was inoculating an interface to everyone, including children.

Very few doctors around the world came out to denounce these and other very serious lies and contradictions. We sensed that they had already paid the health sector to do their job.

The first reports that shed lightluz

Dr. Bartomeu Payeras

Let's leave all the contradictions and falsehoods that were said in the media throughout 2020, and let's start shedding light on this whole plan.

Fortunately, or perhaps thanks to fate, in mid-2020 several reports were presented that helped clarify the confusion that existed until then. The first of them corresponds to the study carried out by microbiologist Bartomeu Payeras Cifre.

Dr. Payeras is a Biologist from the University of Barcelona and specialized in microbiology. He has published various research works. He worked and researched at the Hubber pharmaceutical laboratories in Barcelona with smallpox bacteria and viruses, Biogram to evaluate the activity of vitamin B12. He created and researched the Department of Marine Microbiology at the Oceanographic Laboratory of Palma de Mallorca. He is a member of the Balearic Islands Natural History Society. Clinical analyzes at the Center d’Anàlisis Clínics in Palma. Genetic engineering: Episomal exchange between Paracolobacter and Citrobacter C-3 at the University of Barcelona. Analysis of fecal contamination in the lamelibranch Venus verrucosa in the Port of Mahón. Bull. Soc. Hist. Nat. Baleares, 23 (1979) pages. 163-169. Study of bacterial contamination in the Port of Mahón. Volume XIX Year 1974. Spanish Institute of Oceanography, bulletin no. 203 1975: Study of bacterial contamination in the port of Mahón. Influence of its ecological conditions. Professor of mathematics, physics and chemistry and biology at IEM in Mallorca. He also discovered the Dalí Code with which he encrypted his messages in his paintings, (See the video about it: youtube.com/watch?v=jr55Jfh4jTU)

Dr. Payeras' study is as follows: "Study on the asymmetric distribution of COVID-19 cases and its relationship with 5G technology", published on May 10, 2020³ .

In the midst of the unprecedented chaos that we were experiencing in those months, a scientist finally carried out a very in-depth and precise study that, from today's perspective, was remarkably close to the truth. This study showed a clear, compelling and irrefutable correlation between the incidence of COVID-19 and the location of 5G antennas. As the author suggests, it is important to highlight that the bands used by 4G technology are within the spectrum used by 5G, resulting in a fuzzy boundary. Therefore, the term "5G" must be interpreted in terms of high intensity electromagnetic frequencies.

He analyzed the characteristics of this relationship and the factors that could influence it. He investigated the cause-effect and formulated a hypothesis about what the causative agents of COVID-19 were and how they act. Given the disarray in infection cases in most countries, with a lack of awareness in presenting actual figures, these data did not offer scientifically reliable accuracy. Several countries, including Spain, were not counting the number of "infections" or positive tests due to a lack of available data.

Therefore, the study was based on the relative contamination method instead of the absolute contamination method. This was because it was decided to compare the density values to avoid statistical errors.

I must confess that I did not pay due attention to the videos that he spread on the networks, in which he explained his discovery. At the time, he didn't fully understand the possible relationship between a virus, a disease and cell towers. And I didn't understand it due to lack of relevant information at that time. We were unaware of the existence of graphene and its interaction with human biology and telephone antennas.

As the author very well expresses, “before treating the possible cause-effect, it isIn the study, Dr. Payeras addressed the following topics: first necessary to demonstrate that the correlation exists. And if so, propose possible hypotheses about the factors that influence this relationship.”

In the study, Dr. Payeras addressed the following topics:

1. The main and prior objective is to verify this correlation. For this we analyze:

• If the countries with the most cases of COVID-19 in the world have 5G technology

• If the countries with the highest index in the world have 5G technology

• How many countries in Europe with the highest rate of COVID-19 have 5G?

2. If the proposed hypothesis is affirmative, we analyze:

• The asymmetric distribution between contiguous countries with and without 5G

• The internal asymmetric distribution in countries with cities with and without 5G

• The internal asymmetric distribution in provinces, with cities with and without 5G

• The internal asymmetric distribution in cities, in neighborhoods with and without 5G

3. Analysis of the “Border Effect”, that is, the great difference on one side and the other of an administrative border.

• Between different states with or without 5G

4. Analysis in microstates.

• Microstate with 5G nestled within microstate with 5G

• 5G microstate located between two or more 5G states

• Microstate without 5G nested within state or states with 5G

• Special analysis of the microstate of San Marino

5. Analysis of REMs other than 5G

• Between areas without 5G

• Between areas with 5G

6. Analysis of other factors that may influence the values of the COVID-19 case rate.

• Per capita income

• Population density

• Use of technology d. Size of cities

• Climate.

• Atmospheric pollution.

• Degree of confinement

• Age of the population.

7. Electromagnetic radiation without 5G

• Es Mercadal

• Barcelona

8. Electromagnetic radiation without 5G

9. The Vatican case. A “divine” exception?

10. Vaccines

11. Cause-effect relationship

12. The cause

13. The hypothesis

And these were their conclusions:

1. The results obtained demonstrate a clear, conclusive and irrefutable relationship between the rate of COVID-19 cases and the location of 5G technology.

2. The forcefulness of the results, together with the study and discarding of the other factors studied that can stimulate the “pandemic”, we conclude that the presence of current electromagnetic radiation (EMR), 3G, 4G, 4D LTE, 5G are the discriminating and decisive factor in the potentiation of the COVID-19 disease.

3. Asymmetric distribution. Whether between states, countries, regions, counties or cities, the symmetrical distribution of the indices between areas with and without 5G is confirmed.

4. The numerical results obtained in Es Mercadal, Barcelona and in the Vatican, point in the same direction as scientific and epidemiological studies on the relationship between current electromagnetic radiation (without 5G) and human health.

5. The analysis of the data provided does not confirm the officially admitted hypothesis that it is a “COVID-19 pandemic”; which implies the existence of a virus that is the only causative agent and that at the same time is the contagious agent, since this “pandemic” neither has the typology of a classic pandemic, nor does it comply with Koch's postulate.

6. A “border effect” is significant, original and exclusive to this “pandemic”; with marked differences between states, cities, and contiguous regions with or without 5G implementation.

7. In all the cases studied, an increase in the COVID-19 rate is observed in the areas with the most electromagnetic pollution. The case of microstates is especially significant and illustrative, since being small territories the existence of 5G can cover the entire territory, and it is here where the highest values of COVID-19 indices occur.

8. The case of San Marino is especially significant. It is a “melting pot” where the population has experimented with 5G for the first time. The first state in the world to implement 5G, and the one with the highest rate of COVID-19 cases.

9. It is important to be able to demonstrate that a hypothesis is true, that the opposite is not true. This is why it is very illustrative that on the African continent, with scarce health resources, but without 5G, the index is very low, except for some antennas in the South African Republic (as of April 14, 2020); which coincidentally had the highest numbers of infections in Africa (currently along with Egypt).

10. The regional indices are influenced by those of cities with 5G, but the high indices of these cities are diluted in those of the region to which they belong.

11. Among all the factors studied that can influence the intensification of COVID-19 cases, apart from 5G EMR, are the values of Nitrogen dioxide (NO2) and vaccines

The doctor. Payeras coined a term that he called. "border effect." He said that SARS COV-2 presented the border effect, since there were certain countries that he could not enter, as if the virus was intelligent and refused to cross borders with less development in telecommunications. Let us remember that in most Central African countries the incidence of covid was zero, with zero deaths.

In short, Dr. Payeras statistically demonstrated that countries with greater telecommunications technology had a higher incidence of Covid. And within this group, those with better health services and, therefore, with a higher rate of flu vaccination, the incidence, curiously, was also higher. He thus demonstrated that covid, the flu vaccine and antennas went hand in hand.

Dr. Payeras came very close to the reality we know today without knowing that the flu vaccines of the 2019/20 campaign had introduced a microwave radiation catalyst called reduced graphene oxide, vaccines which we analyzed. These linked variables, the material together with the antennas, were really what was causing the illness and deaths, and not a virus.

In this video of a conference, widely distributed in Spain and Hispanic countries, Dr. Payeras concisely explains the macabre plan of Covid.

Later, in August 2020, Dr. Payeras made an extensive video among friends explaining his work, which was also disseminated online. (Which I am not going to put in so as not to make this entry long).

Likewise, I remember that in some media in the United States news appeared relating flu vaccination to a higher incidence of Covid.

It was this Pentagon study⁴ from January 2020, written by Greg. G. Wolff, where they found that soldiers who received the flu vaccine had a 36% greater risk of suffering from Covid.

Based on the information currently available to me, I have obtained a complete understanding of the topic discussed. I now understand what the scientific literature and governments have expressed with the term "Acute Irradiation Syndrome" of microwaves and their ability to induce flu-like symptoms, which can cause confusion among doctors when considering the possible presence of a pathogenic agent⁵ .

Let us also remember the famous case of Havana Syndrome (which curiously after 2021 begins to be denied in the media)

Barbastros Report

In June 2020, another report prepared by the medical team at the Barbastros Hospital (Spain) appears. This report was called the Barbastros Report or File. They detected that elderly people who had been vaccinated against the flu in 2019 had a very high probability of getting sick and dying than those who had not. To our amazement, as happened with Dr. Payeras' study, they were not listened to. But this report was covered up, treating those who wanted to pull the thread as deniers. The study is hosted by the Spanish Vaccine Advisory Committee⁶ .

These doctors reached the same conclusion as Dr. Payeras, a direct relationship between the flu vaccine and covid. They were also unaware of the existence of graphene oxide in injectables. Although very correct in their study, they were a little lost because, although they recognized that the flu vaccine was related, they blamed a component of it, polysorbate 80, which is a solvent used in vaccines so that The supposed agents can better penetrate the cells by dissolving the sticky layer of the cells. This compound is also toxic, but graphene oxide is much more so.

But what was the relationship between flu vaccines, antennas and Covid? What had they put in them? An important fact: on that date there were no spike proteins, no mRNA, or hydrogels, but their content was the same as in the Covid vaccines. We will talk about it and the investigation in the next installments, but not before saying that Spain plays an important role in the dark side of this whole story. But we were also the first to raise the alarm around the world.

Sources

1. https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2020/jan/26/coronavirus-link-china-biowarfare-program-possible/

2. https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.01.30.927871v2

3. http://tomeulamo.com/fitxers/266_5GREMf.pdf

4. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7126676/

5. https://meridian.allenpress.com/radiation-research/article/195/1/1/446280/Commonalities-Between-COVID-19-and-Radiation

6. https://vacunasaep.org/sites/vacunasaep.org/files/gaston-ananos-hipotesis-vacuna-gripe-covid-19-version1.pdf