History of a Genocide (II)
History of a Genocide (II)
Errors and more errors
In the previous article, History of a Genocide (I), we saw how coincidences do not exist. Let's continue our journey in this second installment.
At the beginning of 2020, in the middle of the pandemic, most people were confused and very afraid. It is not surprising that the media around the world, financed by THEM, tirelessly repeated the official speech of the government in power. I confess that from the beginning I did not see things clearly, because the information that was given on TV was not clear.
The fact that autopsies were banned in 2020 further increased my doubts about the veracity of what was said in the media. Autopsies are important to understand the spread and impact of an epidemic, since they allow the causes of death and the characteristics of the disease to be analyzed and studied.
As attention focused on the vaccine as the only solution to ending the pandemic, I wondered why other options were not being investigated. There seemed to be a single narrative and no other perspective was considered.
Furthermore, it seemed strange to me that a vaccine was being talked about so quickly, when normally the process of developing and testing a vaccine takes years. These questions only increased my skepticism.
As time went by, I also noticed how any information that questioned the effectiveness or safety of the vaccine was censored and removed from social media and online platforms. This made me wonder if we were really getting all the information or if he was hiding something from us.
But there was a light in this dark tunnel when Italian doctors broke the rule not to do autopsies. The valuable information provided by the Italian doctors who carried out autopsies revealed that one of the first effects of Covid was Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation (DIC), characterized by the formation of clots and thrombosis. These findings forced the World Health Organization (WHO) to recognize that Covid-19 was not a respiratory disease, but rather had cardiovascular implications.
This led to questioning the treatments used until now in hospitals, which were mainly based on mechanical ventilation in intensive care units. With these and other measures adopted, only incorrect treatments were followed.
Why weren't autopsies done from the beginning?
Translation: The Ministry of Health recommends not performing autopsies on those who died from covid-19 due to the biological risk of contagion.
Because that's how it was started and communicated from above in most countries. Corpses were immediately sent to the crematorium, thus depriving experts of basic knowledge.
Let us remember the prestigious forensic experts from Spain who spoke out on the matter. The Ministry of Health of that country recommended not performing autopsies on those who died from COVID-19 due to the biological risk of contagion:
"It is recommended not to perform [COVID-19 autopsies] due to the biological risk of contagion for those who performed it and due to the risk of spreading the virus."
This was the main advice that came in the Technical Document of the Ministry of Health entitled "Procedure for the management of corpses of COVID-19 cases", dated April 13, 2020, aimed at health professionals. 1
Autopsies were only restricted to “violent deaths”, according to indications transmitted by the Spanish Ministry of Health.
When the Italians skipped the autopsy rule, in Spain they modified the regulations prohibiting autopsies, and in this sense the previous Document, in its May 2020 version, did allow it. 2
The same thing happened in Italy, the Ministry of Health published regulations in a circular on the matter titled “Emergency indications related to the Covid-19 epidemic in the funeral and crematorium sector.”3
This is an update of the regulations approved since February 22 and reiterated on March 17 and 29, 2020. Point C, titled Autopsy examinations and diagnostic results, is written in paragraph 1:
“During the entire emergency phase period, no autopsies or diagnostic findings should be performed on Covid-19 cases, whether they died in hospital or at home.”
In a similar sense, the recommendation not to use anti-inflammatories was not understood either, they said that they did not offer significant benefits for the management of Covid, recommending the use of Paracetamol instead. Since Covid is fundamentally a disease of an inflammatory nature, endogenous antioxidants play a crucial role in its development and progression. Consequently, the suggestion adopted did more harm than good, since the use of Paracetamol reduces the levels of glutathione, a natural antioxidant of notable potential in our body.4
Translation: The French health minister warned Saturday that "taking anti-inflammatory drugs" such as ibuprofen "could be a factor in worsening the infection"
Translation: The WHO still sees no evidence against ibuprofen but recommends using paracetamol
Let us also remember the falsification of death certificates to inflate the scope of the pandemic, that was also big.
It is curious how now, as of January 2024, Fact-checkers deny that these anti-medical measures were adopted around the world.
In reality, with these and other measures that were disastrously adopted, they wanted to achieve more deaths, and therefore create more fear to ensure subsequent vaccination.
I'm not going to go into this part of the story any further, we all know what we saw.
In the next installment, we will delve into the figure of Dr. Payeras, a prominent Spanish microbiologist who played a fundamental role in clarifying this story. His participation was key in providing valuable clues that brought us closer to the truth.
His discoveries were impressive. Thanks to his insight and ability to connect the dots, Dr. Payeras was able to link seemingly isolated elements, revealing a complex web of connections and hidden secrets.
However, Dr. Payeras was not alone in his search, as there were other individuals involved in the attempt to elucidate this enigma. In this sense, a group of Spanish doctors based in Barbastros, a city in Spain, also carried out parallel research and reached conclusions similar to those of Dr. Payeras.
The clues discovered by these two teams turned out to be of vital importance, laying the foundations for Ricardo Delgado and Dr. Sevillano to later resume the investigation.
Sources
 | A guest post by
|
It's getting more and more interesting
I was completely fooled. They knew how to play with fear. I did not realize. Thanks to what I am reading and rereading, I am understanding many things. Thank you.