One again, an excellent summary of the "details". I concluded years ago that man made hydrogels event in similar fashion to Biofilms. >>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biofilm
Effectively. They have been researching in this line for a long time and never for human good. Polymers have been used in medicine for many decades, and the use of PEG has served to coat nanoparticles in this history.
Magnificent article and very enlightening. It is evident that there are people with the evil intention of deceiving the world. I wonder if they are humans or are they hybrids? How can they collaborate with the destruction of the human species?
The difference between graphene oxide and PEG hydrogel is clear. Very cleverly they talk about other hydrogels by filing patents that have nothing to do with PEG. I wonder why people who read them don't realize this deception.
I got lead to two new substacks today - one the site by ANA MARIA MIHALCEA I read Self Assembly Nanotechnology Polymer Micellar Tubules To Micelles To Vesicle Transitions & right away turn to this page - and then to your piece subtitled "Would you like to eat cricket noodles today?"
just as I was hoping, that piece addresses the issue of 'chitin.' And quite specifically, the effects of consuming it - on the human being. And though your question asks in the course of that post - 'are the people doing this even really human?' - I would like to make sure to drive the implications of that point home, by taking your observations of those 'effects' upon humans to a next - and necessary - level. i was forced to think - and respond to this business of polymer vesicles and 'nano-particles' by the piece on Anna's stack. And now I must response to yours, in kind!
Mostly the problem I have with almost everything I read on substack in opposition to the vaxxassination plot is that everyone adopts the jargon and limitations of what I call 'scientificism' - so as to be seen as 'credible.' Which is understandable, but unfortunately leads to simply ceding the terrain of discussion to the enemy. Should one desist from cooperating in that manner, a whole new 'ground view' of our situation develops. And were one to go back and read what you wrote on the 'crickets' post, it would show up instantly as this -
the aim of the program must be to carefully, sequentially DEBILITATE the natural human physiology and body/mind equilibrium. This change sounds 'relatively' non-horrible until you circle back to the same words and read them again, with this in mind. Those changes are designed to lead to the conclusive 'modifications' of the human which will destroy our MOBILITY - the chitin gradually producing a hardened 'exo-skeleton' a la 'proto-insect' physiology, along with accompanying debilities in our ocular and respiratory functions... which will in turn be compensated for by deliberately imposed ADAPTATIONS which will conform the 'human' to the physiological functions/limitations of the insectile forms of life.
Slowly, gradually... and then - irrevocably. Metamorphis. Can you see it now? Like Kafka could? No, it is way worse than a bad nightmare. Because it is becoming our 'waking' reality. We must stop restricting this discussion to the mundane world of 'science' and begin to exercise the faculties we were given to survive and overcome.
The polymers Ana talks about have nothing to do with the PEG hydrogels in vaccines, which is what this chapter is about.
As for chitin, do not forget that high-quality graphene is extracted from chitin. And the intention of these criminals is to introduce graphene through all means. Also don't forget that with graphene oxide you can insert thoughts and feelings. All this is in the scientific literature, and we have talked about this in some chapter. The ultimate goal of all this is quite dark, possibly creating a new species which will no longer have free will and without a soul.
The impression we get in Spain is that in the United States the False Dissidence has not been correctly identified. In Spain, as in South America, it has been done. We have seen people emerge in each country who defended the non-existent mRNA and denied magnetism and graphene. In my country there are two female doctors, who are not scientists, who are the leaders of that movement.
It is not just Dr. Ana, there is a group where they began, as in Spain, to defend mRNA, then they went on to deny graphene and magnetism and they never talk about these issues, much less about the work of Dr. Campra (2021) demonstrating graphene in vaccines. And now it has been confusing people for some time with polymers that have nothing to do with vaccines. I don't think you have to be very smart to realize these things.
I share you concerns about the various 'red herrings' thrown in the ring. My interest in mentioning her work was to prelude the point I will make below - and to emphasise that almost everywhere I turn now, I'm struck by the 'missing' significance of what i'm going to address here.
I'm sure that the connection tween her post and yours would seem elusive. to the less informed. However, the common ground - or 'terrain' as Bechamp would have it, is in the 'morphic' qualities which these two technologies are employed for.
Given that one of the very qualities sought for in graphene is to 'trick' the immune system into accepting the presence of an 'alien' material - as with hydrogels, where the sought after ability is to move materials through otherwise forbidden cell wall passages, that common ground is not hard to reach for.
Where is the convergence to be found? In the concept of 'pleomorphism' as it can be studied in the various fungal parasitical diseases which 'cloak' their presence and behaviour via the 'shape-shifting' stages by which their form and residence both change! As understanding this process has been virtually banned, so as to keep so-called 'virology' and 'bacteriology' from being exposed as fraudulent coverups, next to no practising clinicians will simply look at the disease phenomenae and relate them to the cycle of changes which these new 'technologies' - most certainly graphene - are designed to imitate.
Here we have to give up on the false dichotomy of 'biological' vs 'chemical' or bio vs synth and realize that the boundaries were long ago trammelled, so that the madmen in the white coats could be authorized to conduct 'experiments' in terror which will surely result in just the consequences which your colleague has correctly laid out in his reply.
While Bechamp's critical insights were of course gained through his proficiency with the microscope, nevertheless it was his application of both practical and theorectical -ie., the IMAGINATIVE faculty guided by observation which allowed him to avoid the mistakes of Pasteur. Indeed, his was the opposite of a 'materialistic' praxis, although rigorously 'scientific' in application. All of what you say about graphene it true, yet it needs be filtered though an understanding of how all our pathetic 'technologies' simply ape biological phenomena, like a monkey might 'ape' a human being. Too many times among the myriad 'anti-vaxxers,' the "forest is being lost for the trees.'
As such, the paradigm of 'self-assemblage' needs be understood as a synthetic attempt to 'ape' the pleomorphic habits of another group of deadly human predators! We cannot be sure at this point that they are not ONE IN THE SAME!
I'm reminded of the time I picked up some old recordings from a street vendor in Havana Cuba. my favorite remains "El Que No Sabe Sabe" by RITMO ORIENTAL... words to live by!
Correct, and that is how we have expressed it. Since 2021 we have been saying the same thing since the scientific literature supports us. Hydrogel has always been used in medicine, among others, to CAMOUFLATE what they are trying to introduce into the body so that the immune system does not easily detect it.
The difference between these two positions is very clear, and it is very easy to understand. We've been watching her since this story began. While some deny graphene and the work of Dr. Campra, others try to divert attention from the truth. The tests and scientific literature are on the table. With a little common sense, not much, anyone would see it. Why do they do this? The answer is easy, these types of groups emerged all over the world like mushrooms, just like the FactCkerckers. They were hired.
The anti-vaxx demi-monde is now so fractious, vitriolic and divisive that I must adhere to a neutral position, so as to be able to search out facts amidst a myriad of 'positions.'
With that in mind, I wonder if you could shed some light on the Campra study, which I read to have involved one single vial. Was his suggestion that the first study be followed up with a wider range of sampling ever instituted? Was that vial given the supposed minus 80 degree protocol?
The Global Research piece stated that Noack's work was a 'follow up' of the Campra study. If that is so, where do you place him on your scale of credibility? I haven't found any reference to him on your site here.
It is not informed. Dr. Campra's report is divided into two parts. The first report, summer 2021, looked at a Pfizer vaccine. The second report, October 2021, analyzed 7 vials of the 4 brands marketed in Spain (Pfizer, Moderna, AstraZeneca and Jansen). The technique used in the second report was micro-Raman, a technique that unequivocally confirms the material you are seeing, in this case reduced graphene oxide.
I advise you to read again the chapters corresponding to the two reports by Dr. Campra, as well as chapter XV, where many other doctors in various parts of the world, even using the same micro-Raman technique, confirmed Campra's work. Science works like this.
I think I made some reference to Dr. Noak in a chapter, but he did not publish any report
Thank you. Those suggestions saved me a lot of time - which I can now spend thinking, instead of hunting and then digesting.
I spent some time yesterday with the GREG REESE substack report featuring two Pfizer whistleblowers... one of whom was a Director of Quality Control on the production line. I believe you would find her comments quite revealing - if not outright astounding.
Since I am not a partisan of any position I can wander around to the full gamut of anti-vaxx sites, drawing from wherever there is a shred of truth. It would have been wonderful to have had the input I've now begun to read on your site to complement what was said on the REESE show. Many shady, unclear, or just mistaken assertions were made, easily correctable by those with greater knowledge. But it is possible, I now see, that you would have been persona non grata there?
But I'm beginning to fear that intractable lines have been drawn - warring parties huddled behind each of them. The name Stew Peters for instance I see commonly being vilified on the Norte Mericano sites, he seems presented in a favorable light on yours. Who is the beneficiary of this internecine war I must ask?
Graphene oxide has been functionalized with PEG, with those famous carbon nanotubes that we have all seen under the microscope.
PEG does not conduct electricity nor does it produce magnetism, which is why they have introduced a material with quantum properties such as graphene.
I am watching an interview with Dr. Lorena, from Argentina, a biotechnologist who works with graphene and she is confirming this. In addition to having denounced graphene in vials, we were talking about it with another doctor who also demonstrated the nonexistence of mRNA.
There is a lot of evidence of graphene, Dr. Lorena just said. An honest scientist knows how science works. If he doesn't admit it it's because he's here to lie.
Wow!! Magnificent publication. Very precise data as always. I appreciate all this valuable information you give us.
It is outrageous to see these criminals walking freely through the streets. They are collaborating with the destruction of our species.
I present an event that occurred not long ago with Dr. Nixon. Can you believe that after 4 years in which the presence of graphene has been demonstrated by multiple doctors in various parts of the world, this doctor says that he has no evidence of graphene? After so many reports that there are and we have seen in this wonderful series. I even gave him data and Dr. Campra's study. Not a word, he simply said that he had no evidence of the presence of graphene in the vials. What a criminal!!
Yes, I was reading the comments. It is incredible that those words came from someone who claims to be a doctor. Of course, he does not apply the principles of science at all, he goes about his business, trying to hide Dr. Campra and graphene.
"I even gave him data and Dr. Campra's study. Not a word, he simply said that he had no evidence of the presence of graphene in the vials."
if you go back to circa 1902-1908 or so, with the Theory of Relativity coming out, they did the same with Aether-- the foundation of free energy. As if under a Reset. Anyone who talked about it still was erased or cancelled. All the rest, out of fear, got in line-- what aether??!?
Nice article; appreciate the images. Under the section on duration of hydrogel, the term "propylene glycol" is mistakenly referenced as PEG, or polyethylene glycol:
"... United States Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry2 summarizes the available scientific data on the health effects of PEGs. And due to its administration in medications and food, once PEG enters the bloodstream, it remains for a short time:
"Propylene glycol breaks down in the body in about 48 hours."
The reference given does not lead to a citation that shows a 48-hour duration of action before breakdown. One has to search within the site.
____
Propylene glycol is different than polyethylene glycol. The former is a compound used in foods, cosmetics, drugs, and antifreeze and is felt by the FDA to be generally safe. Toxicity, most commonly seen after infusion of benzodiazepines, can cause low platelets and death. The half-life of propylene glycol is from 1.4 to 3.3 hours.
___
In contrast, the serum half-life of one molecule of "ethylene glycol" is from 2.5 hours in children to 3–8 hours in adults (Eder et al. 1998).
When PEGylating a protein or antibody to biologically modify it as you describe, multiple ethylene glycol units are attached to it (hence, "poly"). Each PEG-treated compound has a different half-life, depending on the parent compound and other modifications to achieve the desired outcome such as a longer duration of action (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6732144/).
Wondering if you were able to find a specific reference to the duration of action or half-life of the Pfizer jab PEG. Thank you!
One again, an excellent summary of the "details". I concluded years ago that man made hydrogels event in similar fashion to Biofilms. >>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biofilm
We were warned decades ago regarding self assembling nano-materials such as Graphene and Graphene oxides. >>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Smalley
We are now observing the fallout... Viva le Corporation!
Thank you so much.
Effectively. They have been researching in this line for a long time and never for human good. Polymers have been used in medicine for many decades, and the use of PEG has served to coat nanoparticles in this history.
Thank you.
Magnificent article and very enlightening. It is evident that there are people with the evil intention of deceiving the world. I wonder if they are humans or are they hybrids? How can they collaborate with the destruction of the human species?
The difference between graphene oxide and PEG hydrogel is clear. Very cleverly they talk about other hydrogels by filing patents that have nothing to do with PEG. I wonder why people who read them don't realize this deception.
Thank you so much.
That's right, it's not difficult to see the truth.
Thank you
I got lead to two new substacks today - one the site by ANA MARIA MIHALCEA I read Self Assembly Nanotechnology Polymer Micellar Tubules To Micelles To Vesicle Transitions & right away turn to this page - and then to your piece subtitled "Would you like to eat cricket noodles today?"
just as I was hoping, that piece addresses the issue of 'chitin.' And quite specifically, the effects of consuming it - on the human being. And though your question asks in the course of that post - 'are the people doing this even really human?' - I would like to make sure to drive the implications of that point home, by taking your observations of those 'effects' upon humans to a next - and necessary - level. i was forced to think - and respond to this business of polymer vesicles and 'nano-particles' by the piece on Anna's stack. And now I must response to yours, in kind!
Mostly the problem I have with almost everything I read on substack in opposition to the vaxxassination plot is that everyone adopts the jargon and limitations of what I call 'scientificism' - so as to be seen as 'credible.' Which is understandable, but unfortunately leads to simply ceding the terrain of discussion to the enemy. Should one desist from cooperating in that manner, a whole new 'ground view' of our situation develops. And were one to go back and read what you wrote on the 'crickets' post, it would show up instantly as this -
the aim of the program must be to carefully, sequentially DEBILITATE the natural human physiology and body/mind equilibrium. This change sounds 'relatively' non-horrible until you circle back to the same words and read them again, with this in mind. Those changes are designed to lead to the conclusive 'modifications' of the human which will destroy our MOBILITY - the chitin gradually producing a hardened 'exo-skeleton' a la 'proto-insect' physiology, along with accompanying debilities in our ocular and respiratory functions... which will in turn be compensated for by deliberately imposed ADAPTATIONS which will conform the 'human' to the physiological functions/limitations of the insectile forms of life.
Slowly, gradually... and then - irrevocably. Metamorphis. Can you see it now? Like Kafka could? No, it is way worse than a bad nightmare. Because it is becoming our 'waking' reality. We must stop restricting this discussion to the mundane world of 'science' and begin to exercise the faculties we were given to survive and overcome.
The polymers Ana talks about have nothing to do with the PEG hydrogels in vaccines, which is what this chapter is about.
As for chitin, do not forget that high-quality graphene is extracted from chitin. And the intention of these criminals is to introduce graphene through all means. Also don't forget that with graphene oxide you can insert thoughts and feelings. All this is in the scientific literature, and we have talked about this in some chapter. The ultimate goal of all this is quite dark, possibly creating a new species which will no longer have free will and without a soul.
The impression we get in Spain is that in the United States the False Dissidence has not been correctly identified. In Spain, as in South America, it has been done. We have seen people emerge in each country who defended the non-existent mRNA and denied magnetism and graphene. In my country there are two female doctors, who are not scientists, who are the leaders of that movement.
It is not just Dr. Ana, there is a group where they began, as in Spain, to defend mRNA, then they went on to deny graphene and magnetism and they never talk about these issues, much less about the work of Dr. Campra (2021) demonstrating graphene in vaccines. And now it has been confusing people for some time with polymers that have nothing to do with vaccines. I don't think you have to be very smart to realize these things.
I share you concerns about the various 'red herrings' thrown in the ring. My interest in mentioning her work was to prelude the point I will make below - and to emphasise that almost everywhere I turn now, I'm struck by the 'missing' significance of what i'm going to address here.
I'm sure that the connection tween her post and yours would seem elusive. to the less informed. However, the common ground - or 'terrain' as Bechamp would have it, is in the 'morphic' qualities which these two technologies are employed for.
Given that one of the very qualities sought for in graphene is to 'trick' the immune system into accepting the presence of an 'alien' material - as with hydrogels, where the sought after ability is to move materials through otherwise forbidden cell wall passages, that common ground is not hard to reach for.
Where is the convergence to be found? In the concept of 'pleomorphism' as it can be studied in the various fungal parasitical diseases which 'cloak' their presence and behaviour via the 'shape-shifting' stages by which their form and residence both change! As understanding this process has been virtually banned, so as to keep so-called 'virology' and 'bacteriology' from being exposed as fraudulent coverups, next to no practising clinicians will simply look at the disease phenomenae and relate them to the cycle of changes which these new 'technologies' - most certainly graphene - are designed to imitate.
Here we have to give up on the false dichotomy of 'biological' vs 'chemical' or bio vs synth and realize that the boundaries were long ago trammelled, so that the madmen in the white coats could be authorized to conduct 'experiments' in terror which will surely result in just the consequences which your colleague has correctly laid out in his reply.
While Bechamp's critical insights were of course gained through his proficiency with the microscope, nevertheless it was his application of both practical and theorectical -ie., the IMAGINATIVE faculty guided by observation which allowed him to avoid the mistakes of Pasteur. Indeed, his was the opposite of a 'materialistic' praxis, although rigorously 'scientific' in application. All of what you say about graphene it true, yet it needs be filtered though an understanding of how all our pathetic 'technologies' simply ape biological phenomena, like a monkey might 'ape' a human being. Too many times among the myriad 'anti-vaxxers,' the "forest is being lost for the trees.'
As such, the paradigm of 'self-assemblage' needs be understood as a synthetic attempt to 'ape' the pleomorphic habits of another group of deadly human predators! We cannot be sure at this point that they are not ONE IN THE SAME!
I'm reminded of the time I picked up some old recordings from a street vendor in Havana Cuba. my favorite remains "El Que No Sabe Sabe" by RITMO ORIENTAL... words to live by!
Correct, and that is how we have expressed it. Since 2021 we have been saying the same thing since the scientific literature supports us. Hydrogel has always been used in medicine, among others, to CAMOUFLATE what they are trying to introduce into the body so that the immune system does not easily detect it.
The difference between these two positions is very clear, and it is very easy to understand. We've been watching her since this story began. While some deny graphene and the work of Dr. Campra, others try to divert attention from the truth. The tests and scientific literature are on the table. With a little common sense, not much, anyone would see it. Why do they do this? The answer is easy, these types of groups emerged all over the world like mushrooms, just like the FactCkerckers. They were hired.
The anti-vaxx demi-monde is now so fractious, vitriolic and divisive that I must adhere to a neutral position, so as to be able to search out facts amidst a myriad of 'positions.'
With that in mind, I wonder if you could shed some light on the Campra study, which I read to have involved one single vial. Was his suggestion that the first study be followed up with a wider range of sampling ever instituted? Was that vial given the supposed minus 80 degree protocol?
The Global Research piece stated that Noack's work was a 'follow up' of the Campra study. If that is so, where do you place him on your scale of credibility? I haven't found any reference to him on your site here.
It is not informed. Dr. Campra's report is divided into two parts. The first report, summer 2021, looked at a Pfizer vaccine. The second report, October 2021, analyzed 7 vials of the 4 brands marketed in Spain (Pfizer, Moderna, AstraZeneca and Jansen). The technique used in the second report was micro-Raman, a technique that unequivocally confirms the material you are seeing, in this case reduced graphene oxide.
I advise you to read again the chapters corresponding to the two reports by Dr. Campra, as well as chapter XV, where many other doctors in various parts of the world, even using the same micro-Raman technique, confirmed Campra's work. Science works like this.
I think I made some reference to Dr. Noak in a chapter, but he did not publish any report
Thank you. Those suggestions saved me a lot of time - which I can now spend thinking, instead of hunting and then digesting.
I spent some time yesterday with the GREG REESE substack report featuring two Pfizer whistleblowers... one of whom was a Director of Quality Control on the production line. I believe you would find her comments quite revealing - if not outright astounding.
Since I am not a partisan of any position I can wander around to the full gamut of anti-vaxx sites, drawing from wherever there is a shred of truth. It would have been wonderful to have had the input I've now begun to read on your site to complement what was said on the REESE show. Many shady, unclear, or just mistaken assertions were made, easily correctable by those with greater knowledge. But it is possible, I now see, that you would have been persona non grata there?
But I'm beginning to fear that intractable lines have been drawn - warring parties huddled behind each of them. The name Stew Peters for instance I see commonly being vilified on the Norte Mericano sites, he seems presented in a favorable light on yours. Who is the beneficiary of this internecine war I must ask?
Amazing report once again.
Greg Reese is talking to two young Pfizer whistleblowers.
This is your subject:
(I just made some quick notes)
45:26
Graphene is in many aqueous solutions - Cosmetics soap food body wash - Concentration varies
GO is in everything - as a carrier
Internet of Bodies agenda
Harvesting wireless body network and hooking up to crypto
Hydrophobic nanotubes linking to polyethylene PEG chain
Patent 2006 - Approved 2012 - Lines up with the vaccine
Lipid nanoparticle - DSPC
https://gregreese.substack.com/p/pfizer-whistleblowers-melissa-mcatee?utm_source=substack&utm_campaign=post_embed&utm_medium=web&initial_medium=video
It would be good to see your team on some interviews...time permitting, of course.
Thank you.
Graphene oxide has been functionalized with PEG, with those famous carbon nanotubes that we have all seen under the microscope.
PEG does not conduct electricity nor does it produce magnetism, which is why they have introduced a material with quantum properties such as graphene.
I am watching an interview with Dr. Lorena, from Argentina, a biotechnologist who works with graphene and she is confirming this. In addition to having denounced graphene in vials, we were talking about it with another doctor who also demonstrated the nonexistence of mRNA.
The young man -who is supposedly a trained scientist- seems to be 'confused' as well.
He just mentioned mRNA.
He is unsure if graphene is in the vials.
Perhaps that is why he is on the 'show'...
The Cabal seem intent on hiding the Graphene content and promoting the mRNA.
There is a lot of evidence of graphene, Dr. Lorena just said. An honest scientist knows how science works. If he doesn't admit it it's because he's here to lie.
It is a fight of good against evil.
I agree. It's disheartening to see so many people on the payroll.
Wow!! Magnificent publication. Very precise data as always. I appreciate all this valuable information you give us.
It is outrageous to see these criminals walking freely through the streets. They are collaborating with the destruction of our species.
I present an event that occurred not long ago with Dr. Nixon. Can you believe that after 4 years in which the presence of graphene has been demonstrated by multiple doctors in various parts of the world, this doctor says that he has no evidence of graphene? After so many reports that there are and we have seen in this wonderful series. I even gave him data and Dr. Campra's study. Not a word, he simply said that he had no evidence of the presence of graphene in the vials. What a criminal!!
Thank you
Yes, I was reading the comments. It is incredible that those words came from someone who claims to be a doctor. Of course, he does not apply the principles of science at all, he goes about his business, trying to hide Dr. Campra and graphene.
"I even gave him data and Dr. Campra's study. Not a word, he simply said that he had no evidence of the presence of graphene in the vials."
if you go back to circa 1902-1908 or so, with the Theory of Relativity coming out, they did the same with Aether-- the foundation of free energy. As if under a Reset. Anyone who talked about it still was erased or cancelled. All the rest, out of fear, got in line-- what aether??!?
Correct. False Dissidence has always been present in our civilization. There have always been people hired to lie.
Nice article; appreciate the images. Under the section on duration of hydrogel, the term "propylene glycol" is mistakenly referenced as PEG, or polyethylene glycol:
"... United States Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry2 summarizes the available scientific data on the health effects of PEGs. And due to its administration in medications and food, once PEG enters the bloodstream, it remains for a short time:
"Propylene glycol breaks down in the body in about 48 hours."
The reference given does not lead to a citation that shows a 48-hour duration of action before breakdown. One has to search within the site.
____
Propylene glycol is different than polyethylene glycol. The former is a compound used in foods, cosmetics, drugs, and antifreeze and is felt by the FDA to be generally safe. Toxicity, most commonly seen after infusion of benzodiazepines, can cause low platelets and death. The half-life of propylene glycol is from 1.4 to 3.3 hours.
___
In contrast, the serum half-life of one molecule of "ethylene glycol" is from 2.5 hours in children to 3–8 hours in adults (Eder et al. 1998).
When PEGylating a protein or antibody to biologically modify it as you describe, multiple ethylene glycol units are attached to it (hence, "poly"). Each PEG-treated compound has a different half-life, depending on the parent compound and other modifications to achieve the desired outcome such as a longer duration of action (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6732144/).
Wondering if you were able to find a specific reference to the duration of action or half-life of the Pfizer jab PEG. Thank you!