History of a Genocide (XVIII)
Masks contain graphene oxide
In the previous chapter (History of a Genocide - XVII) the presence of graphene in the PCR tests was evident. In reality it is not contamination, it is something that has been done INTENTIONALLY.
In this chapter we will address the controversial issue of masks, a topic that has generated debate and continues to generate controversy despite the fact that their use is still recommended.
During 2020 and 2021, masks were mandatory, despite doubts about their effectiveness, due among other logical arguments to the size of the supposed virus, since it could pass through the pores of any mask without difficulty. However, its use was still recommended.
Let's remember what the government and its media spokespersons said, that in 2020 the flu had magically disappeared, there were no flu patients, they were all Covid. Of course, they continued with the lie so that their Covid Project was successful.
Once again we saw that the decisions that were made were political and had nothing to do with science or medicine. There are many studies that have discussed the harmfulness of wearing masks for a long time, causing a multitude of health problems. Let's look at some.
The studies
01. Doctoral Thesis Technical University of Munich (Germany)
This 2004 thesis1, carried out at the Technical University of Munich (Germany), examined the harmful effects of wearing protective masks.
The thesis clearly states that immediately after putting on a mask, more exhaled CO2 is inhaled than normal. The harmful effects were so significant that the PhD was only allowed to evaluate the subjects for a maximum period of 30 minutes so that they would not be harmed.
The effects included increased tiredness, faster breathing, irregular heartbeat, increased lack of concentration and reduced motor skills. I can't imagine those children who confirmed to me that they wore the mask 9 hours a day, between school and daily life.
Through this research, it is concluded that the continuous use of the mask causes the following harmful effects:
Increased rebreathing of expelled CO2.
Significant increase in breathing, increased respiratory rate and hyperventilation.
A higher heart rate.
A significant increase in CO2 in the blood.
Hypoxemia: what is an abnormal decrease in the partial pressure of oxygen in arterial blood.
A hypercapnia, which is an increase in CO2 pressure in the blood.
A general cognitive impairment.
Greater difficulty in psychomotor tasks.
In addition to what has been mentioned, also an important psychological aspect when using and seeing other people with a mask is that interpersonal relationships are profoundly altered, since, when you see another person with a mask, you can consciously or unconsciously perceive them as a threat to one's health.
2. Study of the anticoagulant protein S.
In this other study from July 26, 20182, it revealed that there is a connection between masks, hypoxia and blood clots. The study was based on protein S. Protein S is an anticoagulant protein that is part of the blood clotting system. Its main function is to inhibit coagulation and prevent the formation of thrombi.
Debido a que la proteína S se produce principalmente en el hígado, el equipo de investigadores cultivó células de hepatocarcinoma humano con oxígeno normal y también condiciones hipóxicas y luego midió los niveles de la proteína.
They found that increasing hypoxia not only reduced PS but also significantly increased a protein that activates the gene to produce hypoxia. This suggested that the protein, hypoxia-inducing factor 1, could regulate the S protein, which the researchers confirmed using biochemical and genetic approaches in a mouse model.
The study found that protein S level was reduced by 50% when O2 levels were at 15% (instead of the normal 21%).
3. The Lethal Link between Masks, Hypoxia, and Blood Clots
A well-cited Oregon Dissenter article3 titled 'The Lethal Link between Masks, Hypoxia, and Blood Clots' extrapolates from this research and explains the implications:
Only a 5% drop in blood oxygenation is considered 'abnormal', but a 15% reduction will cause noticeable symptoms. These include headaches, dizziness, nausea and cognitive impairment. Even surgeons can suffer from low O2 levels and associated symptoms simply by wearing a surgical mask.
At sea level, the air we breathe is 21% oxygen. The high altitude where pilots can suffer harmful effects begins even at 5,000 feet (1,500 m). The commonly used N95 mask dwarfs that elevation; It is well known to cause a 20% reduction in O2, which simulates the 16% O2 of 6,000 feet (1828.8 meters).
4. CDC study
In this other study4 carried out by the North American CDC, from May 5, 2020, no significant reduction in influenza transmission was found with the use of masks. However, they were forced by something that we will see later.
5. Denmark Study
In May 2020, a study was carried out in Denmark and published in the journal Annals of Internal Medicine, which demonstrated that masks did not prevent the spread of COVID. The study confirmed that those people who used the mask more were at greater risk of "catching" Covid.
Now we understand why, we know that the masks were tuned with graphene, therefore those people who used the mask the most ended up getting sick.
6. Germany Study
In this other study from April 20215, it shows how prolonged use of the mask leads to problems such as hypoxia, fatigue, increased carbon dioxide in the blood, decreased oxygen saturation in the blood, increased heart rate, increased blood pressure, increased respiratory rate, difficulty breathing, headache, dizziness, feeling hot and sweating, decreased ability to concentrate, decreased ability to think, drowsiness, decreased perception of empathy, function of impaired skin barrier with itching, acne, skin lesions and irritation, perceived general fatigue and exhaustion.
The prolonged use of masks, according to the study, would have the potential, according to the facts and correlations they found, to provoke a chronic sympathetic stress response induced by changes in blood gases and controlled by brain centers. This in turn induces and triggers immune suppression and metabolic syndrome with cardiovascular and neurological diseases.
Analysis of the masks
But the most serious problem with wearing a mask is that you were breathing graphene, since the analyzes that were carried out found graphene as well as graphene filaments. Now we understand the Danish study that said that those people who wore a mask were "infected" more by covid.
One of the most important analyzes carried out on masks is that of Dr. Antonietta Gatti. We were already seeing in the previous chapter her study also carried out with PCR. Dr. Antonietta Gatti, is Doctor in Experimental Physics at the University of Bologna - Italy Ph.D. in Biomedical Technologies (Bioengineering) at the Faculty of Medicine of the University of Bologna. She examined both masks and PCR under a microscope as well as analyzed their ingredients.
In her laboratory, Professor Gatti used electron microscopy (ESEM and EDS) to analyze various types of masks. According to her study, it contained undeclared products, such as graphene oxide nanoparticles (carbon and oxygen), silver, aluminum, titanium, glass fibers, silicon, zirconium, sulfuMany videos circulated about microscope analysis of masks, there were many people who already doubted everything. Like Mike Adams, a very active person in the fight against this Genocide, and who in his analysis found graphene and graphene filaments of different colors.r and sodium.
Let's see a fragment of the interview that Shimon Yanowitz did on March 28, 2021, where in addition to seeing the PCRs under a microscope, images of masks also appear and how they are impregnated with graphene.
Many videos circulated about microscope analysis of masks, there were many people who already doubted everything. Like Mike Adams, a very active person in the fight against this Genocide, and who in his analysis found graphene and graphene filaments of different colors.
When the news spread that the masks contained graphene, many countries decided to remove them from stores, making you see that they were taking care of you. At that time it was unknown what graphene was. Canada was one of those countries that made this decision in March 2021. According to the press release, Health Canada conducted a preliminary scientific assessment and identified a potential for early pulmonary toxicity in rats from inhalation of graphene," which led to the removal of masks with this material.
However Health Canada6 allowed SSNM masks containing graphene to be sold again in Canada. THEY immediately gave the order to the president, a close friend of the WEF, to sell masks with graphene oxide again, when the scientific literature clearly states that breathing this type of material is extremely dangerous, causing pneumonia and pulmonary fibrosis.
On the other hand, in July 2021, a news item was mentioned on the Graphene-info7 website in which the company Directa Plus supported the use of graphene nanomaterials in face masks to combat COVID, arguing their effectiveness. However, the reality is that graphene is the cause of Covid.
The company Directa Plus was founded in 2005 in Italy to develop innovative production processes for graphene-based nanomaterials.
In Spain, measures were taken following the example of Canada when receiving the alert about the presence of graphene in masks. In this sense, the Spanish Agency for Medicines and Health Products made an official statement8 on April 15, 2021 communicating the withdrawal, marketing and use of type IIR surgical masks with graphene. More than half a million graphene masks were recalled. But of course, when they received the order from the boss, these masks continued to sell.
Here is the official statement from the Spanish government with the order to remove masks with graphene.
Many media outlets echoed this news. Like the newspaper 20 minutes, where it was reported that several autonomous communities (Basque Country and Castilla y León) and the Madrid City Council ordered the precautionary removal of masks with graphene, after the union notice that they had been distributed in millions among public officials. (healthcare and security forces).
The scientific literature is very clear regarding the toxicity via inhalation of graphene oxide. The nasal route represents a means by which nanomaterials can access the brain of exposed individuals. Thin sheets of graphene oxide can move from the nasal cavity to the brain, as we saw in the previous chapter.
I am very afraid that, as happened with the PCR tests distributed in 2017, it is very likely that the masks were already prepared and tuned with graphene long before the Pandemic. Now we understand why companies that dedicated themselves at the beginning of 2020 to manufacturing masks on their own, which in the face of such a crisis the government should have been grateful for, all the masks were confiscated, and in all likelihood destroyed and never used, since that the intention of all governments was for all people to wear masks with graphene.
This is also the reason why people who were not swabbed or vaccinated became ill with covid.
Finally, let's look at some videos that circulated online with images of graphene ribbons and filaments in masks seen under a microscope.
In the next chapter we will address a worrying topic for us, since for THEM they are always arguing that the measures taken are for our own benefit. And it's not like that, it never was like that. It is closely related to our feeding.
 | A guest post by
|
They had everything well calculated. I wouldn't be surprised if they had the masks already prepared with graphene before 2020.
Magnificent research. As always, truly instructive articles. Open your eyes to anyone
All this is endless. I wonder how deep this all goes? A plan like this, so meticulously designed, can only come from a very perverse mind. Who is behind all this?
Thanks for all this information. It is very valuable.