History of a Genocide (XVII)

PCR tests contain graphene oxide and graphene filaments

In the previous chapter of "History of a Genocide - XVI", we saw how in 2013 Spanish scientists managed to give graphene oxide the magnetic property. It is no coincidence that vaccinated people develop magnetic properties after receiving the vaccine.

Although the original idea was to discuss PCR and masks together, due to the amount of information it will be done in two independent chapters. So in this chapter we will deal with a topic that, although it had its controversy at the time in the history of this Genocide, is no less important because it is still valid at this time. We are referring to PCRs.

I already told you how in January 2020 I was surprised that, given the medical crisis that emerged in some countries, a vaccine began to be promoted as the only solution without considering other effective alternatives that were already being used. I found this suspicious as the "infection" was just beginning and other medical alternatives that were proven to be effective were not being considered.

When the PCR tests came into this story, the exact same thing happened to me. It caught my attention that to verify if a person was infected with the supposedly deadly coronavirus, they had to take a test. And that test had to be done by inserting a stick through the nose to the bottom of the skull. I didn't understand it.

And I didn't understand it by simple logic. (Now I will speak in official terms as we are used to seeing on TV and other places, understand what I am going to write, we know that the virus does not exist). They told us on TV that the virus was so contagious that if you came across an infected person, you could become infected and die. If that was the case, why did they have to stick a stick up your nose all the way to the bottom to find out if you had the virus and see if you were infected? If it was so contagious, why not do a saliva test to see if you had the virus? You spit on a rack and that's it. Was the virus found in the mouth less contagious than the virus found at the bottom of the skull?

Now we understand it, because in the analyzes that were done later, when we discovered graphene in the vaccines, we saw that the tests were also contaminated with graphene, in addition to other toxins. Now it is understood, through the nerves of smell, graphene can reach the brain, its objective.

Throughout 2020 there was a lot of controversy about the effectiveness of these Tests. The same inventor, Kary Mullis, stated that they were not used to diagnose any disease, however it was used for this. It was very easy to increase the test cycles so that all the results were positive. But the alarming thing about the history of PCR tests is very similar to Event 201 which I was talking about in the first chapter. What would you think if I told you that the global sale of PCR for Covid 19 began to be distributed in 2017 throughout the world? Well, that's how it is and you're going to check it out.

Effectively, in 2017, PCR tests for Covid 19 were distributed around the world. And you will ask me: But was the term covid-19 invented in 2020? How did it appear in 2017? One more proof that this entire criminal plot had been brewing for many years.

Let's see it. Do you know what WITS is? WITS, World Integrated Trade Solution, is an online platform developed by the World Bank that provides detailed information on international trade, including data on tariffs, trade regulations, international treaties, trade statistics and more. This platform is used by governments, academics, researchers and companies to analyze and manage their business operations internationally.

In the following image captured from the WITS page itself in September 2020, a series of purchases and sales from all countries in 2017 appears. The title with which it appears, and I write literally, is this: COVID-19 Test kits (300215) exports by country in 2017. The numeric code that appears is a code that corresponds to each transaction that is made worldwide on a specific product. Therefore, the code 300215 corresponds to the Tests for Covid-19.

Since we live in a world where the truth is always hidden, it turns out that the information that I captured in 2020 has now been manipulated and does not appear as it appeared in 2020¹. Criminals always erase the traces of crime if they can. Now, if you go to the same page, you will see they have removed all references to the word Covid-19.

Luckily I was able to find the original captured version on archive.org, which is a tool that allows users to view previous versions of web pages, offering a unique window into the Internet's past².

So what does this mean? Well, this whole plot, this whole Covid Project, was already planned years before. If purchases began in 2017, it means that at least a year before, it was already being manufactured.

Let's see a fragment of a video that circulated on the internet in 2020. It was created by a Spanish individual who analyzes and comments on all the aspects mentioned above.

We were wrong to think that the dissemination of this information on the networks would stop the plan in progress. And we have all seen how it has not even stopped with the discovery of graphene in the vials. In a normal world, this would have been a scandal and politically responsibilities would have been demanded. But no side of all the governments has expressed anything.

PCR studies and analysis

1. Study of the Slovak Republic

In 2020, a microscope analysis of these tests was carried out in the Slovak Republic. The author is unknown. The test swabs came from equipment used in surface testing in Slovakia and in hospitals. According to the study, "the tests are a criminal tool of genocide in the population of Slovakia. This is a global, thoughtful and carefully prepared event."

This image from the study shows how the fibers of the swabs were broken at their ends, with a kind of hook at the end.

According to the author, the purpose of having the ends broken was to inoculate something. He broke off some of the strands, as shown in this image.

He put this material on the slide and found a series of beads that are very reminiscent of the graphene bubbles that we saw in previous chapters in Covid vaccines.

In short, he found undeclared foreign elements in the fibers of the swabs.

2. Study by Dr. Antonietta Gatti

There were also other brave people who tested the swabs. Like the Italian doctor Antonietta Gatti. Doctor in Experimental Phisics at the University of Bologna - Italy Ph.D. in Biomedical Technologies (Bioengeneering) at the Faculty of Medicine of the University of Bologna. He examined various PCRs under the microscope as well as masks and analyzed their ingredients.

In her laboratory, Professor Gatti used electron microscopy (ESEM and EDS) to analyze various types of swabs. According to her study, it contained undeclared products, such as graphene oxide nanoparticles (carbon and oxygen), silver, aluminum, titanium, glass fibers, silicon, zirconium, sulfur and sodium.

The doctor said the following: “The company explains that the core of the fiber is made of nylon with a coating of a proprietary material that, upon analysis, turns out to be silicate-zirconium-titanium. This coating stiffens the fiber so that it can tear the mucosal membrane. There is a possibility that the pressure applied during the smear maneuvers could break some fibers that remain in situ. When this happens, they can cause a foreign body reaction that can damage the mucous membrane in such a way that breathing and speaking become difficult."

Damaged mucous membranes cannot fulfill their task of defending against viruses, bacteria and fungi before they reach the respiratory tract. And in the healing process of the mucosa, broken fibers can penetrate the tissue without the possibility of removing them, causing the formation of a granuloma or fibrotic tissue, as occurs with any foreign body. But our politicians knew perfectly well the consequences that the introduction of graphene in this way would cause.

Let's see a fragment of the interview that Shimon Yanowitz did on March 28, 2021.

3. Study “Meningitis due to cerebrospinal fluid leak after nasal swab testing for COVID-19”

Scientific studies appeared around the world addressing the problem of using this technique, of course, studies that were quickly silenced. For example, a study³ from February 2021 concluded that "Although some complications can be considered benign (discomfort, pain or bleeding), serious complications have begun to be described in the medical literature in recent weeks, in particular, ruptures of the anterior level of the skull base associated with risk of meningitis”.

The Academy cited several studies, including one that documented "meningitis due to cerebrospinal fluid leak after nasal swab test for COVID-19."

4. Study by the French National Academy of Medicine

In this other study dated April 10, 2021, the French National Academy of Medicine warned that nasal swabs were associated with an increased risk of meningitis⁴.

5. Chile Study

In this other study from March 2021: "Cerebrospinal flid leak after nasopharyngeal swab testing for COVID-19. A report of two cases", two cases were investigated where there were serious complications after doing a PCR test. The study is hosted on the website of the Chilean Society of Otorhinolaryngology⁵.

6. Study by biotechnologist Lorena Diblasi

The study carried out by biotechnologist Lorena Diblasi was very shocking, as she found radioactive technetium in the swabs.

Based on this discovery, the Argentine Diego H. Barrientos showed a video on his YouTube channel where another person in Europe shows how swabs emit ionizing radiation using a Geiger counter. Also at the end of the video Lorena Diblasi appears stating what she found. Let's watch the video.

We all saw how these tests became extremely common. A part of the scientific society was concerned because swabs were being used more and more and because more and more people were undergoing repeated tests, "sometimes in inadequate conditions."

The function of the PCR tests was to introduce graphene and other elements to people. Introduce it as close as possible to the olfactory nerves, and since graphene nanoparticles have an affinity for the nervous system, it would pass directly to the brain without causing problems in other organs.

This is the technique used today to introduce graphene into the brain with intranasal vaccines. To illustrate what I'm saying, you can see this 2020 study⁶ titled “Nose-to-Brain Translocation and Cerebral Biodegradation of Thin Graphene Oxide Nanosheets”", where they demonstrate how thin sheets of graphene oxide can move from the nasal cavity to the brain.

Now you can understand why people with Covid lost their sense of smell. A virus that attacks the lungs and brain? When has this been seen? And not only to these organs, but to all the organs of the system. How have they known how to play with people's ignorance!! To this day I continue to find forums and substacks where people continue to talk about viruses, infections, Long Covid, etc. How blatantly they continue to deceive people! Of course, if they continue doing it it is because they are False Dissidence.

Numerous people who underwent this test ended up falling ill with Covid symptoms, which are known to be caused by graphene. There have also been reported cases where these people had magnetic properties in their face and head, despite not having been vaccinated. Subsequently, they were told that they were contaminated since the primers were thus predisposed, with the aim of generating fear and alarm in society to recruit as many people as possible to subsequently introduce the liquid interface.

Among the people who criticized the effectiveness of PCR, the president of Tanzania John Magufuli, who was also a doctor and geologist, stands out. In 2020 he questioned the veracity of the PCR tests, showing that he tested positive for a papaya, car engine oil, a goat and other products. After these statements he was murdered. Magufuli became the first president of six African leaders who lost their lives for their opposition to the 2030 Agenda.

Given these studies and statements by politicians, a multitude of videos emerged on networks where people did PCR tests on everything and verified that they tested positive. Let's look at some examples. Let's see these videos of tests carried out on kiwi and beer.

At the end of 2022, intranasal vaccines against covid began to be marketed. Much more effective for neuromodulation, since the included graphene goes directly to the olfactory nerves and from there it passes to the neurons. In addition, part of the content also passes to the lung directly.

In this fragment of live number 526 of La Quinta Columna, from September 2023, Dr. Sevillano commented on the effectiveness of introducing graphene through the olfactory nerves, reaching the neurons directly as we have seen in the scientific literature, and he also commented the new intranasal vaccines that appeared at the end of 2022 and that are currently being inoculated to people, especially children.

To finish this PCR topic, we are going to watch a video made by José Luis Camacho, from the YouTube channel "Mundo Desconocido". It must also be said that this person was from the beginning denouncing this farce and denouncing graphene in vaccines. He has collaborated several times with La Quinta Columna. José Luis Camacho bought pork and rubbed it with a cotton swab; The number of graphene morguelones that appeared was alarming.

The introduction of graphene in PCR explains why people who were not vaccinated but swabbed, showed magnetism on their face and forehead. And why deep in the nasal cavity? To translocate graphene to the brain through the olfactory nerves. Now you will understand why your sense of smell was lost when you had Covid.

In the next chapter we will discuss another topic closely related to this, masks.

1. https://wits.worldbank.org/trade/comtrade/en/country/ALL/year/2017/tradeflow/Imports/partner/WLD/nomen/h5/product/300215

2. https://web.archive.org/web/20200904040543if_/https://wits.worldbank.org/trade/comtrade/en/country/ALL/year/2017/tradeflow/Exports/partner/WLD/nomen/h5/product/300215

3. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33480112/

4. https://www.academie-medecine.fr/les-prelevements-nasopharynges-ne-sont-pas-sans-risque/

5. https://sochiorl.cl/uploads/81-02-6.pdf

6. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666386420301879#bib39