Biblical translations and other texts considered sacred have been deliberately manipulated over the centuries. The evidence presented by Biglino regarding the biblical Elohim reveals how many of the original narratives have been distorted to fit interpretations that reinforce the power of religious and political elites. Biglino points out, for example, that key terms and fundamental concepts have been translated in a biased manner or altered, in reality concealing a much more complex story that often contradicts official versions. This suggests that the scriptures do not always reflect an absolute truth but have been shaped to support a discourse that favors certain interests and keeps the masses in ignorance, reinforcing the idea that traditional religions may be more instruments of control than a path to spiritual truth.
Thanks for your comment. I completely agree. We've seen, once again, that manipulation of this farm has been commonplace for centuries. We intuit why they did this, but further investigation is needed.
One of the things that was shocking to me was when I learned that these "theologians" were aware of these falsifications all along, but were still willing to remain in the lie and deceive even truth seekers, for the sake of material goods + the exercise of power!
Yes, that's correct. To believe that theologians or the Church knew nothing about this is very naive. This intervention was carried out deliberately as a control measure; we have the proof in history.
It's very clear. The theologians themselves know this, but they fall and continue to tell the same fantasies. The proof is in the responses of the theologians in the discussion.
The Hebrew word “YHWH”—the sacred name of God—was never spoken by the ancient Jews. The Greek translators of the Septuagint, centuries before Christ, encountered that word; they translated it not as “God,” but as “Kyrios”—“Lord”—to avoid profaning the ineffable. But here comes the truly terrifying part: when St. Jerome translated the Bible into Latin in the fourth century, he himself admitted in private letters that he didn’t fully understand the original meaning of terms like “nephesh” (soul), “ruach” (spirit), or even “’ēl” (god).
Very correct. The Hebrews couldn't name the name YHWH, so every time they read the Bible, they changed this name to Adonai, which means lord, and then it passed into Greek like this, but in reality when we see Lord, we have to change it to YHWH.
This is the first time I've seen several religions debate a common topic, and, as expected, they differ or disagree on many aspects. It's curious: they start from a shared idea or concept, but over the centuries, the evolution of each tradition has led them to interpret it in multiple ways.
And let's not even talk about Islam, a religion that, like many others, has been exploited throughout history by political powers, empires, and movements that have used its vocabulary, texts, and symbols to justify conquest, social control, or ideological agendas. Selective interpretations of texts and traditions have been used to legitimize wars, oppression, or exclusivism, while other currents within Islam itself—such as Sufism, legal schools, and reformist interpretations—have sought to reinterpret ideas in ethical, social, and peaceful terms. Hence, what some call "manipulation" is, in reality, a dynamic field of hermeneutical struggles, historical interests, and cultural contexts that have been exploited by different actors over time, from hegemonic rulers to colonizers and the media. This does not mean that the faith itself is homogeneous or that all its followers share these interpretations.
The hands of these Elohim have always been behind it, and very few cultures are realizing it.
They created religions precisely to further divide human beings, so they could control us much better, in addition to pitting us against each other in wars in the name of a non-existent God.
Biblical translations and other texts considered sacred have been deliberately manipulated over the centuries. The evidence presented by Biglino regarding the biblical Elohim reveals how many of the original narratives have been distorted to fit interpretations that reinforce the power of religious and political elites. Biglino points out, for example, that key terms and fundamental concepts have been translated in a biased manner or altered, in reality concealing a much more complex story that often contradicts official versions. This suggests that the scriptures do not always reflect an absolute truth but have been shaped to support a discourse that favors certain interests and keeps the masses in ignorance, reinforcing the idea that traditional religions may be more instruments of control than a path to spiritual truth.
Thanks for your comment. I completely agree. We've seen, once again, that manipulation of this farm has been commonplace for centuries. We intuit why they did this, but further investigation is needed.
One of the things that was shocking to me was when I learned that these "theologians" were aware of these falsifications all along, but were still willing to remain in the lie and deceive even truth seekers, for the sake of material goods + the exercise of power!
Yes, that's correct. To believe that theologians or the Church knew nothing about this is very naive. This intervention was carried out deliberately as a control measure; we have the proof in history.
The conference is excellent, and the clarity and honesty with which Mr. Biglino speaks is worthy of mention.
I agree, Biglino is not only clear but also honest with the text.
It's very clear. The theologians themselves know this, but they fall and continue to tell the same fantasies. The proof is in the responses of the theologians in the discussion.
Indeed, it's the same as with graphene. They know it and keep quiet.
Does anyone know where the entire meeting described here is online? I'm referring to the meeting of the theologians and Biglino on March 5.
I found this link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6WwANDMCzuo
Thank you very much for the information and the link.
One thing is what these gentlemen say, and another is what is written.
That's how it is
The Hebrew word “YHWH”—the sacred name of God—was never spoken by the ancient Jews. The Greek translators of the Septuagint, centuries before Christ, encountered that word; they translated it not as “God,” but as “Kyrios”—“Lord”—to avoid profaning the ineffable. But here comes the truly terrifying part: when St. Jerome translated the Bible into Latin in the fourth century, he himself admitted in private letters that he didn’t fully understand the original meaning of terms like “nephesh” (soul), “ruach” (spirit), or even “’ēl” (god).
Very correct. The Hebrews couldn't name the name YHWH, so every time they read the Bible, they changed this name to Adonai, which means lord, and then it passed into Greek like this, but in reality when we see Lord, we have to change it to YHWH.
thanks for the information
It's incredible how much manipulation there has been of all this!!
This is the first time I've seen several religions debate a common topic, and, as expected, they differ or disagree on many aspects. It's curious: they start from a shared idea or concept, but over the centuries, the evolution of each tradition has led them to interpret it in multiple ways.
And let's not even talk about Islam, a religion that, like many others, has been exploited throughout history by political powers, empires, and movements that have used its vocabulary, texts, and symbols to justify conquest, social control, or ideological agendas. Selective interpretations of texts and traditions have been used to legitimize wars, oppression, or exclusivism, while other currents within Islam itself—such as Sufism, legal schools, and reformist interpretations—have sought to reinterpret ideas in ethical, social, and peaceful terms. Hence, what some call "manipulation" is, in reality, a dynamic field of hermeneutical struggles, historical interests, and cultural contexts that have been exploited by different actors over time, from hegemonic rulers to colonizers and the media. This does not mean that the faith itself is homogeneous or that all its followers share these interpretations.
The hands of these Elohim have always been behind it, and very few cultures are realizing it.
They created religions precisely to further divide human beings, so they could control us much better, in addition to pitting us against each other in wars in the name of a non-existent God.
Another hoax, the Sea of Reeds, not the Red Sea.