These alleged 'networks' may be able to send or receive signals, but coherent data? No. These papers submit a cartoon-like image of the *perceived* device, yet offer no electrical schematic detailing the functional circuit configuration. "Self-assembly" of a sophisticated electronic circuit would be akin to throwing handfuls of capacitors, resistors, and semi-conductors into a bucket, and expecting a moon landing. Self-assembly is bullshit, and trained electronics engineers know it's bullshit.
Those engineers who speak only know what THEY wanted them to know.
You have the proof under the microscope. We have observed how they self-assemble on their own, forming these microantennas, microrouters. The proof is that vaccinated people emit MAC addresses, and when you analyze a drop of the vaccine, you only find graphene and a type of orthorhombic crystals. When a few days pass, that same drop begins to see elaborate structures that were not there before. So how do you explain that fact?
I assumed that you had already read all the previous chapters, the scientific literature is very explicit in this sense. Look at the hundreds of studies by Dr. Journet, and how they have achieved bidirectional communication with microantennas and microrouters. Or like with graphene, a rat's fear of its natural predator was removed. Who knows where this technology that some people know came from, because it seems magical that something liquid begins to assemble on its own and with intelligence. I repeat, you have the proof in the MAC addresses issued by vaccinated people, something inside has had to be assembled to be able to issue and receive these dynamic addresses, they are not static. how do you explain it?
It's surprising that you know everything about this farce. And what surprises me most is that you base yourself on what others say they know about electronics. It even answers what scientists demonstrated in 2016 by removing the fear of rats with graphene, which you haven't said anything about, the turn you've taken is surprising.
The phenomenon of MAC addresses is not unusual as you say, it is very common, the evidence is there, written and corroborated by other scientists in various parts of the world. The False Dissidence criminals are those who have denied this phenomenon since it appeared in 2021. We already know that they are hired criminals and there are many of them on social networks, as we have seen in the latest videos of La Quinta Columna, they are in the networks to entangle, lie, deny the evidence.
Regarding patents, you try to deceive by saying that many are not effective, and everyone knows that a patent is approved when it is verified that they are very effective, another matter is that they buy them so that they are never carried out.
I forgot to say that I already told you about this experiment with rats injecting them with graphene in chapter 16. Once injected and with radio frequencies or microwaves like those produced by antennas, the material was taken to the brain. And they knew what "key" they had to press to neuromodulate the rat's brain.
It is curious how some, without being scientists, come to explain with assumptions what they really did in said experiment.
Very correct, the evidence puts everyone in their place.
We must be careful with False dissidence, they camouflage themselves as dissidence when they are not. They have always denied MAC addresses, just like graphene, creating discomfort and confusion in people so that they never know the truth. real criminals
Could it be that they have hit the nail on the head in the presentation of the scientific study, and that is annoying?
Great presentation, thank you.
These alleged 'networks' may be able to send or receive signals, but coherent data? No. These papers submit a cartoon-like image of the *perceived* device, yet offer no electrical schematic detailing the functional circuit configuration. "Self-assembly" of a sophisticated electronic circuit would be akin to throwing handfuls of capacitors, resistors, and semi-conductors into a bucket, and expecting a moon landing. Self-assembly is bullshit, and trained electronics engineers know it's bullshit.
Those engineers who speak only know what THEY wanted them to know.
You have the proof under the microscope. We have observed how they self-assemble on their own, forming these microantennas, microrouters. The proof is that vaccinated people emit MAC addresses, and when you analyze a drop of the vaccine, you only find graphene and a type of orthorhombic crystals. When a few days pass, that same drop begins to see elaborate structures that were not there before. So how do you explain that fact?
I assumed that you had already read all the previous chapters, the scientific literature is very explicit in this sense. Look at the hundreds of studies by Dr. Journet, and how they have achieved bidirectional communication with microantennas and microrouters. Or like with graphene, a rat's fear of its natural predator was removed. Who knows where this technology that some people know came from, because it seems magical that something liquid begins to assemble on its own and with intelligence. I repeat, you have the proof in the MAC addresses issued by vaccinated people, something inside has had to be assembled to be able to issue and receive these dynamic addresses, they are not static. how do you explain it?
It's surprising that you know everything about this farce. And what surprises me most is that you base yourself on what others say they know about electronics. It even answers what scientists demonstrated in 2016 by removing the fear of rats with graphene, which you haven't said anything about, the turn you've taken is surprising.
The phenomenon of MAC addresses is not unusual as you say, it is very common, the evidence is there, written and corroborated by other scientists in various parts of the world. The False Dissidence criminals are those who have denied this phenomenon since it appeared in 2021. We already know that they are hired criminals and there are many of them on social networks, as we have seen in the latest videos of La Quinta Columna, they are in the networks to entangle, lie, deny the evidence.
Regarding patents, you try to deceive by saying that many are not effective, and everyone knows that a patent is approved when it is verified that they are very effective, another matter is that they buy them so that they are never carried out.
The evidence puts everyone in their place.
I forgot to say that I already told you about this experiment with rats injecting them with graphene in chapter 16. Once injected and with radio frequencies or microwaves like those produced by antennas, the material was taken to the brain. And they knew what "key" they had to press to neuromodulate the rat's brain.
It is curious how some, without being scientists, come to explain with assumptions what they really did in said experiment.
The teeth of those who wear sheep's clothing were clearly visible.
Very correct, the evidence puts everyone in their place.
We must be careful with False dissidence, they camouflage themselves as dissidence when they are not. They have always denied MAC addresses, just like graphene, creating discomfort and confusion in people so that they never know the truth. real criminals
Could it be that they have hit the nail on the head in the presentation of the scientific study, and that is annoying?
Casting doubt on MAC addresses is typical of False Dissidence from the start.