History of a Genocide (X)
History of a Genocide (X)
Scientific studies on the toxicity of graphene
In the previous chapter (History of a Genocide - IX), we were describing how Dr. Campra's second and definitive report appeared, which unequivocally concluded the presence of reduced graphene oxide in 7 vials of four brands of Covid vaccines.
We spent countless hours examining images from the scientific literature, as well as looking under a microscope for months, which allowed us to become familiar with the three characteristic forms of this material: micro-sheets, ribbons, nanotubes and graphene oxide filaments.
Since reading Dr. Campra's first report, as I mentioned above, I began devouring studies in the scientific literature on graphene oxide. I avoided reading those articles that had been published after 2020 due to the obvious manipulation that could exist in them to cover up the existence of this material, offering alternative or ridiculous explanations. When he found something relevant, he would send it to Ricardo, who would then comment on the article that night.
Graphene oxide perfectly explained the Covid disease, since the hundreds of studies I found did so. Some treated the pneumonia it caused; others damage the circulatory system, producing, among other things, thrombi; other heart damage, brain damage, liver damage, kidney damage, cancer, etc. etc.
Now I understood the doubt I had until then. There has never been a virus in history that attacks every organ in the body, but a toxic chemical has. Wherever it passes it creates inflammation.
It was more than clear. Dr. Campra provided irrefutable proof, which together with the toxicity studies of graphene oxide, explained this farce in detail. They introduced graphene oxide in the flu vaccines of the 2019 vaccination campaign; visual analysis under a microscope of these vaccines would confirm this later. This material has a remarkable capacity to absorb electromagnetic energy, and we live in an environment saturated with these waves. If graphene oxide already causes damage on its own, the increase in its energy absorption capacity and its excitation within the body would cause even more serious oxidative stress. It was only necessary to raise the microwave radiation from the antennas a little so that those inoculated would get sick and die more quickly.
That was the cause of the deaths in 2020, it was not a virus, it was graphene. They told us that covid did not affect children or young people, only the elderly. And we constantly saw deaths in nursing homes in the "misinformation" media. What happens in these residences? That everyone is super-vaccinated against the flu.
After the implementation of the Covid vaccine, we have verified that this disease not only "attacked" the elderly, but also young people and children, since graphene oxide had been introduced to them. They were so malicious that they tricked people by telling them to get vaccinated to protect against Covid, when in reality the vaccine was causing it.
The False Dissidence, working for THEM, does everything possible to distract our attention from graphene and keep the truth hidden. They talk and continue talking about mRNA, spike proteins, snake venoms, prions, plastics, hydrogels or spider polymers, but they avoid talking about graphene. Despite attempts to hide graphene, Dr. Campra has unequivocally demonstrated its existence. Furthermore, his study has been replicated and confirmed in other parts of the world, with similar results. Later we will also examine these studies conducted in various countries.
These individuals disguised as scientists represent a false dissidence that has collaborated and continues to collaborate in the greatest genocide in the history of humanity. Although they know the truth thanks to their access to microscopes or other scientific tools, they intentionally hide it. This strategy seeks to sow confusion among us, fostering debates and discussions about contradictory theories while they continue to exterminate humanity. They are the worst scum that has existed in the history of humanity.
Graphene oxide toxicity
What I present here is only a small sample of the extensive scientific literature that exists in relation to the toxicity of graphene oxide. I actually don't know how many studies there are published, but I have more than 200 registered, and I haven't wanted to keep looking for more.
Before looking at some of the hundreds of studies on the matter, let's look at these interesting studies as an introduction to better understand this disease.
1. Graphene oxide is detected in the body as if it were another pathogen1
In this 2018 study, researchers from Karolinska Institutet, the University of Manchester and Chalmers University of Technology demonstrate that the human immune system handles graphene oxide in a similar way to pathogens. In other words, the immune system does not care whether it is a bacteria, virus or graphene oxide, it will respond in the same way as if it were a virus.
2. Graphene oxide has a very high signal transmission capacity in the gigahertz ranges2
This study confirms how graphene oxide (GO) is a strong candidate for a high-efficiency interconnector in the radiofrequency range. The effectiveness of GO was investigated in the range of 0.5 to 40 GHz, confirming that GO has a high potential to transmit signals in the gigahertz ranges.
3. rGO (reduced graphene oxide) provokes a host-viral response in the immune system as if it were a pathogen3.
In this 2014 study, the impact of surface oxidation state on the interactions between graphene nanomaterials (graphene oxide, GO, and reduced graphene oxide, rGO) and cells was investigated. The results indicate that the differential oxidation state of the surface of these nanomaterials plays a crucial role in regulating their biological interactions. Furthermore, the toxicity mechanisms associated with GO and rGO, attributed to their surface oxidation state, were explored.
Toxicity in human biology
Let us now look at some of the scientific studies on the high toxicity of graphene oxide and reduced graphene oxide, in vitro and in vivo.
CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEM
4. Control of the cardiac activity of a living being remotely using graphene4
This 2018 study, described in the May 18 issue of Science Advances, where researchers at the University of California, San Diego School of Medicine, could accelerate or slow down the heart rate with graphene from a distance. The study focuses on the interaction of graphene with light exclusively.
Let's see what Savchenko, a researcher in this study, says:
"We were surprised at the degree of flexibility, that graphene allows you to pace cells literally at will," Savchenko said. "You want them to beat twice as fast? No problem—you just increase the light intensity. Three times faster? No problem—increase the light or graphene density."
Mouse heart cells grown on graphene beat at a rate controlled by light stimulation
Let us remember that light is a type of electromagnetic energy like microwaves. Visible light is a form of electromagnetic radiation found on the electromagnetic spectrum, which also includes other forms of radiation such as radio waves, microwaves, infrared, ultraviolet, X-rays, and gamma rays. Light is made up of particles called photons, which are carriers of electromagnetic energy. When light interacts with matter, it can be absorbed, reflected or transmitted, allowing us to see and perceive it.
Graphene is highly conductive and receptive to electricity, and can be charged through electromagnetic fields generated by telephone antennas or Wi-Fi, among other energy sources. Additionally, reduced graphene oxide has been shown to penetrate tissues and organs, posing a potential risk if it adheres to the heart.
This danger is aggravated when the material is charged with the heart's own electrical energy during sports practice, or external energy. The cases of vaccinated athletes who have died due to arrhythmias and those who have retired for the same reason are numerous worldwide.
5. Graphene oxide causes blood clots5
This 2018 study shows the unique interactions of graphene oxide (GO) with blood components including the following aspects:
Binding to plasma proteins: Upon injection into the bloodstream, GO interacts with plasma proteins, leading to the formation of a “biomolecular corona.” This corona is a layer of proteins and other biomolecules that adhere to the surface of GO, influencing its behavior and interactions with biological systems.
Thrombogenicity: The two-dimensional nature of GO can lead to serious effects such as thrombogenicity, which refers to the potential of a material to induce the formation of blood clots.
Activation of immune cells: GO can activate immune cells, generating pro-inflammatory responses in cells and animals.
6. Thrombus Inducing Property of Atomically Thin Graphene Oxide Sheets6
In that other study from 22011, it is shown "that atomically thin GO sheets elicited a strong aggregative response in platelets by activating Src kinases and releasing calcium from intracellular stores"... " Intravenous administration of GO "induces extensive pulmonary thromboembolism in mice."
The study shows that we should be careful when using GO in biomedical applications, such as diagnostic and therapeutic tools, due to its potential to cause blood clotting.
7. Blood exposure to graphene oxide may cause anaphylactic death in non-human primates7
This 2020 study concludes that blood exposure to graphene oxide (GO) under the maximum safe initial dose can cause accidental death in mammals, including non-human primates. Elevated immunoglobulin E levels and severe lung lesions were found in dead animals, suggesting GO-induced acute anaphylactic reactions.
8. Cardiovascular Effects of Pulmonary Exposure to Single-Wall Carbon Nanotubes8
This 2007 study tested the cardiovascular impacts of respiratory exposure to single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNTs). The study used mice to evaluate the effects of SWCNT exposure on oxidative stress, mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) damage, and atherosclerosis progression.
The findings revealed damage to lung, aorta and heart tissue, indicating oxidative insults, as well as damage to aortic mtDNA and accelerated plaque formation.
The authors emphasize in the study the importance of investigating the possible cardiovascular impacts of exposure to nanomaterials, highlighting the need for continued exploration of nanotoxicology and its implications for human health.
RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
9. Pulmonary Toxicity of Single-Wall Carbon Nanotubes in Mice 7 and 90 Days After Intratracheal Instillation9
One of the oldest studies I consulted is this one from 2004. It dealt with the toxicity of single-walled carbon nanotubes in the lungs.
To understand it, a carbon nanotube is a cylindrical structure made of carbon (graphene). Carbon nanotubes can have different properties, which gives them various applications in fields such as electronics, composite materials and energy, among others. They are known for being very resistant, lightweight, and excellent electrical and thermal conductors. Under microscopy it is usually seen as a round filament.
The study consisted of administering carbon nanotubes to mice 7 and 90 days after respiratory administration. They were divided into groups and given a low or high dose of carbon nanotubes. Lung tissue was collected and examined histopathologically to determine the presence of lung lesions. All nanotube products were found to induce epithelioid granulomas and, in some cases, interstitial inflammation in animals in the 7-day groups. These lesions persisted and were more pronounced in the 90-day groups. In addition, the lungs of some animals also revealed peribronchial inflammation and necrosis that had spread to the alveolar septa. These results suggest that carbon nanotubes are much more toxic than carbon and may be more toxic than quartz.
You can get an idea of the seriousness of what we are dealing with, these carbon nanotubes have been injected into millions of people all over the planet without their consent.
10. Graphene oxide administered intramuscularly accumulates in the lungs, causing pulmonary toxicity and death due to granuloma10
This 2018 study focuses on the hemotoxicity of graphene nanomaterials and highlights the importance of understanding their interactions with blood components before using them in medicine.
11. Inhaled carbon nanotubes reach the subpleural tissue in mice11
In this 2009 study, he demonstrates how carbomine nanotubes, if breathed, produce pulmonary fibrosis, a cause of lung cancer.
James Bonner of the University of North Carolina, Raleigh, USA, and colleagues exposed mice to aerosols of nanoparticles (multilayer carbon nanotubes) for 6 hours at both high doses of 30 milligrams per cubic meter and low doses of 1 milligram per cubic meter. cubic meter. Several weeks after exposure, these mice have developed pulmonary fibrosis (small scars in the airways) of a subpleural type.
When we discuss the topic of masks we will see how they also had graphene in their composition. Hence, studies like the one in Denmark showed that people who wore masks were more likely to have Covid. And let it be known to Controlled Dissidence that there are no hydrogels of any kind in the masks.
12. Graphene oxide produces lung Covid, mitochondrial damage, post-inflammatory syndrome, pulmonary fibrosis, alteration of the immune system and cytokine storm12
This 2016 study analyzes the toxicity of nanoparticles from the graphene family (GFN). The document covers topics such as its effects on the central nervous system, reproduction and development, and its toxicity in cellular models, oxidative stress, DNA damage, inflammatory response, apoptosis, autophagy and necrosis.
The literature on the toxicity of GO and rGO is very extensive. In order not to extend this article too much, here are some other studies with the toxicity of graphene oxide in the respiratory system, there are more but I have chosen these as a sample:
13. Toxicity of graphene on normal human lung cells13
14. Respiratory toxicity of multiwall carbon nanotubes14
15. Physicochemical properties based on the differential toxicity of graphene oxide/reduced graphene oxide in human lung cells mediated by oxidative stress15
16. An evaluation of the cytotoxic effects of graphene nanoparticles on human lung epithelial cells16
NERVOUS SYSTEM
17. Reduced graphene oxide induces transient opening of the blood-brain barrier: an in vivo study17
A 2015 study concludes that systemically injected reduced graphene oxide (rGO) penetrates the blood-brain barrier, mainly permeating the thalamus and hippocampus of rats, and can be detected and monitored in the brain over time thanks to a new application. for MALDI-MSI.
Being aware of the important oxidative stress that rGO produces in itself, when administered in human biology, the electromagnetic fields would amplify the rGO signal, as we have seen, causing more damage wherever it is. Therefore, it can never be biocompatible.
18. Functionalized Carbon Nanotubes in the Brain: Cellular Internalization and Neuroinflammatory Responses18
In this 2013 study, they show how carbon nanotube (CNT) is introduced into neurons in vivo, concluding that any medical application of this material in human biology will have an inflammatory response, activation of cytokines and glial cells, which suggests that oxidation of the surface of nanotubes may contribute to a sustained inflammatory reaction in the healthy brain.
19. Nose-to-Brain Translocation and Cerebral Biodegradation of Thin Graphene Oxide Nanosheets19
2020 study. Shows how graphene oxide sheets can travel from the nasal cavity to the brain via the olfactory nerve. Graphene oxide accumulated in the brain undergoes changes consistent with biodegradation.
Before continuing, what I have to tell you is very interesting. What the hell does a pharmaceutical company have to do with another dedicated to the study and research of graphene? Well that's right, now we understand why NanoGrafi, a Turkish company dedicated to the graphene industry, released its intranasal vaccine against Covid in 2021. Or how this company dedicated itself to manufacturing PCR. And it was the Minister of Industry who presented said vaccine, instead of the Minister of Health20.
Another example, why do AstraZeneca executives also belong to the Graphene Flagship company, a very powerful industry in Europe that markets graphene?21
I don't think we need to clarify more, everything is very clear, right? Especially when we discover that graphene becomes magnetic in contact with living cells.
20. PEGylation of Reduced Graphene Oxide Induces Toxicity in Cells of the Blood–Brain Barrier: An in Vitro and in Vivo Study22
DIGESTIVE SYSTEM
KIDNEYS
21. Evaluation of Graphene Oxide Induced Cellular Toxicity and Transcriptome Analysis in Human Embryonic Kidney Cells23
Studies from 2019, showing how graphene oxide generates DNA damage, cell apoptosis, ROS and decreases glutathione and glutathione peroxidase levels. This is the reason why antioxidant levels in people with Covid are very low, since the body tries to alleviate the damage of GO with antioxidants.
22. Nephrotoxicity of graphene in the kidneys24
2016 study showing that graphene oxide is nephrotoxic and its toxicity may be mediated by oxidative stress. It concludes that the data analyzed showed that exposure of male rats to GO caused an oxidative stress response in the kidneys.
LIVER
23. A transcriptomic overview of lung and liver changes one day after pulmonary exposure to graphene and graphene oxide25
2021 study, where graphene nanoparticles have been shown to enter systemic circulation; therefore, they have the potential to cause damage to organs throughout the body. Organs with an ample blood supply, such as the liver, spleen, and kidneys, are especially vulnerable.
24. Autoimmune hepatitis after COVID vaccination26
In this 2021 study, which shows how a percentage of the population vaccinated against Covid suffered from hepatitis.
Let us remember those mysterious hepatitises that appeared in vaccinated children, and that doctors declared they did not know their origin. Knowing that all vaccines have graphene oxide and that it produces inflammation wherever it passes, we now understand the origin of these hepatitises that doctors did not understand.
25. Autoimmune hepatitis after COVID-19 vaccine: more than a coincidence27
26. Acute autoimmune-like hepatitis with atypical anti-mitochondrial antibody after mRNA COVID-19 vaccination: A novel clinical entity?28
REPRODUCTIVE SYSTEM
27. Short-term in vivo exposure to graphene oxide can cause damage to the gut and testis29
The study investigated the effects of short-term in vivo exposure to graphene oxide (GO) on the intestine and testes of Acheta domesticus. The research found that GO exposure caused an increase in oxidative stress parameters, DNA damage, and degenerative changes in A. domesticus tissues. Both pure GO and Mn2+-contaminated GO produced similar adverse effects.
28. Graphene oxide affects in vitro fertilization outcome by interacting with sperm membrane in an animal model30
The study results suggest that GO may affect the functional parameters of sperm during capacitation, which is a crucial process for fertilization. The study provides important information on the potential impact of GO on male fertility and the fertilization process. The conclusions drawn from the study are that GO can interact with sperm membranes, affecting their function, and that the concentration of GO is a critical factor in determining its impact on the fertilization capacity of sperm.
29. Effects of Nano-Graphene Oxide on Testis, Epididymis and Fertility of Wistar Rats31
30. Toxicology Study of Single-walled Carbon Nanotubes and Reduced Graphene Oxide in Human Sperm32
DNA DAMAGE AND CANCER
27. Graphene oxide can induce mutagenesis (cancer) in vitro and invivo
28. Hydroxylated-Graphene Quantum Dots Induce DNA Damage and Disrupt Microtubule Structure in Human Esophageal Epithelial Cells33
These are the conclusions reached by this research team about Graphene Quantum Dots:
Graphene Quantum Dots induce G0/G1 cell cycle arrest and disrupt the cytoskeletal system in human esophageal epithelial cells.
Graphene Quantum Dots inhibit microtubule assembly and increase genotoxic effects by interfering with DNA repair proteins' transport.
Graphene Quantum Dots induce DNA damage and increase genomic instability in human esophageal epithelial cells.
The nanoparticles are efficiently uptaken by the cells and induce apoptosis at high doses.
Graphene Quantum Dots alter the expression of genes associated with various DNA damage response signaling pathways, indicating their significant genotoxic effects on the cells.
29. Toxic response of graphene quantum dots34
This study concludes that Graphene Quantum Dots were capable of triggering genotoxicity in cells
30. Can graphene quantum dots cause DNA damage in cells?35
This study demonstrates that oxidative stress (ROS) produced by GQDs is responsible for the observed DNA damage.
31. Graphene promotes lung cancer metastasis through Wnt signaling activation induced by DAMPs36
The conclusions of this team are clear, graphene causes lung cancer.
32. Graphene oxide nanosheets induce DNA damage and activate the base excision repair (BER) signaling pathway both in vitro and in vivo37
Previous studies revealed that GO nanosheets have the potential to induce mutagenesis in vivo and in vitro (Liu et al., 2013). Park et al. reported that high concentration of GO (50–400 μg/mL) and its derivatives could induce severe toxicity in A549 cells (Park et al., 2015).
OTHER STUDIES
37. A differential effect of graphene oxide on the production of proinflammatory cytokines by murine microglia38
38. Nanotoxicity of Graphene and Graphene Oxide39
39. Graphene microsheets enter cells through spontaneous membrane penetration at edge asperities and corner sites40
Study of graphene with cell membranes. It shows how graphene is intruded into cells due to the irregular edges of materials made from graphene.
40. Multi-walled carbon nanotubes induce T lymphocyte apoptosis41
Having presented this brief description of the toxicity of graphene oxide, it is difficult to understand how they intended it to be biocompatible. Furthermore, why do they continue research in the field of biomedicine if the toxicity of graphene and its derivatives has been demonstrated for decades? The answer seems obvious: there is a clear intention to make the population sick and reduce it.
Furthermore, since nanotechnology has been introduced, it can also be inferred that there is the objective of neuromodulating and controlling the rest of the species.
Some studies on graphene were aimed at achieving its biocompatibility and its use as a vehicle to deliver drugs was even investigated. However, it will not be possible to be biocompatible due to various reasons. In addition to the problems it already presents on its own, reduced graphene (rGO) acts efficiently as a conductor and superconductor, efficiently absorbing energy. It will never be biocompatible due to the constant presence of strong electromagnetic radiation in our environment, caused by telephone antennas and Wi-Fi networks in all cities and towns. Scientific literature shows that rGO amplifies the electromagnetic energy signal up to 1000 times in three wave magnitudes. This implies that the oxidative damage caused by this radiation would be multiplied by 1000 in people who have this material inside them.
Given the evidence presented in the samples of Covid vials, which contain an undeclared radiomodular toxicant, and taking into account the toxicity of this material according to scientific literature, La Quinta Columna strove to raise awareness among as many people as possible through videos like this.
PLEASE ALERT YOUR RELATIVES AND FRIENDS OF THIS GENOCIDE. PASS ALL THIS INFORMATION TO HIM. WHEN YOU HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY, TELL IT TO UNKNOWN PEOPLE TOO.
SPREAD THIS SUBStack AMONG YOUR FAMILY AND FRIENDS SO THAT THE TRUTH CONTINUES SPREADING THROUGHOUT THE WORLD. THE SURVIVAL OF THE HUMAN SPECIES IS AT STAKE. THANK YOU.
For the first time in history we have realized that we are not the owners of this world, but we have been made to believe it. No political party or opposition has denounced the presence of graphene oxide in vaccines. What they have done is deny it, which makes them accomplices. In all countries the same pattern has been followed: graphene has been introduced into vaccines to be injected into innocent populations. No matter the political orientation of the country, everyone is complicit. The contract that the politicians had with the people has been broken. We don't trust them anymore. This makes us think that they are not the ones who really run their own countries, the governments obey someone we do not know. And although they apparently make us believe that each one is the enemy, they were never separated.
In the next installment, we will continue exploring another phenomenon that emerged in 2021. A Spanish doctor detected during the summer of that year that vaccinated people emitted a signal, as an ID, as if they were mobile phones.
 | A guest post by
|
"The False Dissidents work for THEM."
Unfortunately that is most of the 'alternative media' - whose followers are often as naive as they are sycophantic.
Many of the 'resistance' openly make Masonic signs of recognition during interviews and broadcasts.
.."the governments obey someone we do not know."
The higher level figure heads are all eugenicists who hate humanity.
Thanks a lot for your effort. Great job.